15-08-2019, 02:18 PM
(15-08-2019, 01:30 PM)raven wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Only look VMS. By only looking VMS, can we say:
- These symbols were important for cultural origin!
- These symbols may be pictorgams or dieograms! (can we say: "no way"?)
- These symbols must be linked with the book's subjects (because in this book, in the beginning, in the preface)
You say, the nude women are goddess. You are true. I think so too. But we must make this determination. I saw a lot of theory says that pages are for woman's sexual illnes!!! A lot of theory didn't make this determination! Firstly we must read the drawings and make determinations about:
- Writer
- Cultural origin,
- Geographical origin,
- Language origin...
It is very important. Because a theory about VMS must answer all of determination. But usually some people say "I solvad it". When ı hear this I'm looking for this points in his/her theory, but there is no answer. Usually the people only look text. These analyses videos for this goal. After analyses ı will put my theories videos about F1r. Of course that's not all I'm going to say. At that time we can disscus and you can help me with your opinion and critism. Thank you for your writing again. Have a nice day!
Yes, you´re right, we should agree with you determination, the symbols and drawing led us to the origin, not the text by itself, because, we can´t read it. Or at least the most people can´t. And nobody knows who reads it correct. Even I do think, that I can´t read it completely.
And to the nude women... of course there are some cultures with nymphs or something like this, like the Greeks for example, but in VMS they have berets de Basque or at least "sorginak hats". Maybe I´m wrong, but for me it´s seems to be possible.

