116v

[Helmut Winkler]

I guess we should also keep in mind that it might not be "gas" mich. It might be "gaf" mich (there is an abrasion in the parchment where the crossbar for the "f" would be and there is a very slight trace of ink). I usually transcribe it as gas/gaf.

I'm pretty confident it's "s". If you zoom it, you'll see that this trace of ink is actually the part of the "m" 's ascender. And that mens that "s" and "m" are really very close to each other, virtually no space. I'd say, 99% for "s".

And I think we should not underestimate the fact that gas/geis makes sense, gaf does not