19-04-2019, 10:14 PM
Yeah, what I did was a more complicated but faster way to reach the same results.
What surprised me is that the more inclusive count (always counting benches and e-clusters) comes close enough to Latin. But at the same time, we know it's completely different from Latin because of positional restrictions, things like word initial o and complementary distribution of a and y.
So it kind of works for vowels as a category but not for individual vowels.
What surprised me is that the more inclusive count (always counting benches and e-clusters) comes close enough to Latin. But at the same time, we know it's completely different from Latin because of positional restrictions, things like word initial o and complementary distribution of a and y.
So it kind of works for vowels as a category but not for individual vowels.