20-03-2019, 06:47 PM
Hm, that sounds like I was thinking once: What if, the endings are flexible.
When I write a sentence in my memory book, I use also mnemonics similar to those from the medieval scholar,
the endings of words are abbreviated but I use "flexible" rules. This means that and ending 9, x or y does not have a particular fixed meaning
if I use the example line:
"When I write a sentence in my memory book, I use the same mnemonics, something like a flexible shorthand"
becomes like, where there's a underscore _ there is an abbrev. and my brain will figure out what it says
if you replace for example anything with _s, by s / anything with _n & _m by n and all other endings by 9.
But, again those rules are not strict.
Whe_ I write_ a senten_ce in m_y memor_y book, I use _the same_ mnemonics
will look like:
Whn I wri9 a sentn in m9 memo9 book, I us9 the sam9 mnemonics
Still, in relation to the VMS there are big problems:
* the rules of letters frequency and the words initial letters still comply (and the vms text does not)
* the amount of unique resulting letters is still too high (vms has a lower count)
* difficult words, such as names, foreign names, must be written in full (and there are none in the VMS)
..and some other measure-able things.
Even when you remove (delete) the first letters of words, or the letters that you do not want (to get finally about 17 different letters), these problems are still there.
When I write a sentence in my memory book, I use also mnemonics similar to those from the medieval scholar,
the endings of words are abbreviated but I use "flexible" rules. This means that and ending 9, x or y does not have a particular fixed meaning
if I use the example line:
"When I write a sentence in my memory book, I use the same mnemonics, something like a flexible shorthand"
becomes like, where there's a underscore _ there is an abbrev. and my brain will figure out what it says
if you replace for example anything with _s, by s / anything with _n & _m by n and all other endings by 9.
But, again those rules are not strict.
Whe_ I write_ a senten_ce in m_y memor_y book, I use _the same_ mnemonics
will look like:
Whn I wri9 a sentn in m9 memo9 book, I us9 the sam9 mnemonics
Still, in relation to the VMS there are big problems:
* the rules of letters frequency and the words initial letters still comply (and the vms text does not)
* the amount of unique resulting letters is still too high (vms has a lower count)
* difficult words, such as names, foreign names, must be written in full (and there are none in the VMS)
..and some other measure-able things.
Even when you remove (delete) the first letters of words, or the letters that you do not want (to get finally about 17 different letters), these problems are still there.