Voynich decoded completely

[-JKP-]

Did anybody understand in detail the frame shift part and how it was applied to the passages in question?

I was a biochemist and am familiar with the concept yet in the explanations above there was no clear example that I could see of that part of the process. That absence seems to be a major fault of the presentation which has been largely overlooked.
...


The frame shift approach could be one such model that bears further investigation.

...

I agree the concept itself is interesting (it's one of the reasons I bothered looking at the presentation in detail). Ideas like this are very familiar to cryptanalysts, but other than the way Hoffmann uses the glyph "o" as a marker to introduce and delimit a new phrase, I cannot see anything one might term a "frame" or any sign that the interpretation is being shifted (or in which a shift in the sense of a "mutation" that might affect the rest is trying to be avoided).

Putting the frame-shift idea to the side for the moment, in his most recent post, he refers to "re" (one of the highly repeating fragments) as meaning a "thing" and he's constantly referring to context (with questionable reasoning for expanding some of the tokens to create the context), so the impression I get he is interpreting some of the syllable fragments as multi-use syllables. In other words, here it means this, there it means something else, as a generalized token. Unfortunately, once again, that implies very broad subjective interpretation.