He's doing more than shifting things, and adding things in. He's also changing "n" to "m" for example, if the result of the previous shifting and changing isn't enough to wrestle it into a word.
-----------------------------------------
But in trying to discern the method...
His transliteration is
te ea ne texta
Which he translated as
you there, finish the fabrics
The word "texta" is not fabrics in Latin. "Textura" is [woven] fabrics, so the "ur" has to be assumed, but texta could be expanded into other things besides fabrics, and even the word "textura" has other connotations besides fabric, such as "framework" or underlying structure. Assuming it means fabrics is a subjective leap.
The word "te" does mean "you" but one would not write "te ea ne" in Latin or anything close to it. It's like he's taking the first word and the last and making up everything in between, but what is in between is mostly meaningless (it's ungrammatical fragments) and is not enough to substantiate his interpretation of "texta" as fabrics. One might wrestle it into "you, it's not fabrics" but it's not how it would be said in Latin–and is still very ungrammatical.
-----------------------------------------
But in trying to discern the method...
His transliteration is
te ea ne texta
Which he translated as
you there, finish the fabrics
The word "texta" is not fabrics in Latin. "Textura" is [woven] fabrics, so the "ur" has to be assumed, but texta could be expanded into other things besides fabrics, and even the word "textura" has other connotations besides fabric, such as "framework" or underlying structure. Assuming it means fabrics is a subjective leap.
The word "te" does mean "you" but one would not write "te ea ne" in Latin or anything close to it. It's like he's taking the first word and the last and making up everything in between, but what is in between is mostly meaningless (it's ungrammatical fragments) and is not enough to substantiate his interpretation of "texta" as fabrics. One might wrestle it into "you, it's not fabrics" but it's not how it would be said in Latin–and is still very ungrammatical.