Hi!
As far as I can judge, Hoffman's "frame shifting" is just the ignoring of spaces and rebuilding of the words into the needed from the parts of the Voynich words connecting or dissecting them.
For example, the Voynich text:
pody lshed ypdy shedy opchedy, according to his table is his sentences #1 and #2, not counting the part of the word opchedy (pchedy):
1) te an reo uni reret en 2) re ur in rea
Actually, it looks like he deleted spaces to get this (for #1 and #2): podylshedypdyshedyo | pchedy, then he shifts them in this way:
1) p od yl she (d?)yp-d 2) y sh ed yo 3) p ch ed y..... and so on.
Mr. Hoffman, I don't understand a little why you translate yl as reo, if in your table y is ne and er. It must be neo or ero. dyp-d must be nert-en, or mert-en, or mnet-en, or nnet-en. Please, explain this. Where is a mistake?
As far as I can judge, Hoffman's "frame shifting" is just the ignoring of spaces and rebuilding of the words into the needed from the parts of the Voynich words connecting or dissecting them.
For example, the Voynich text:
pody lshed ypdy shedy opchedy, according to his table is his sentences #1 and #2, not counting the part of the word opchedy (pchedy):
1) te an reo uni reret en 2) re ur in rea
Actually, it looks like he deleted spaces to get this (for #1 and #2): podylshedypdyshedyo | pchedy, then he shifts them in this way:
1) p od yl she (d?)yp-d 2) y sh ed yo 3) p ch ed y..... and so on.
Mr. Hoffman, I don't understand a little why you translate yl as reo, if in your table y is ne and er. It must be neo or ero. dyp-d must be nert-en, or mert-en, or mnet-en, or nnet-en. Please, explain this. Where is a mistake?