I did a bit of reverse engineering, to see if it's possible to work out the missing step in the translation process.
If
re ur in rea = Innerhalb der Wunde der Betroffene brenne. (The victim/part burns within the wound.)
then the intervening "frame shift" would probably have the Latin word "ardeat" at the end.
Can we surmise that "rea" refers to [a]r[d]ea[t] and that three letters have been added using M. Hoffman's method? I don't see any way to make so few words into Latin without adding letters.
The affected part or victim can be expressed in a number of ways in Latin, but two common ways would be vulnus or victimas/victimam (depending on how the sentence is phrased) and I don't see anything in re ur in rea that might expand into either word (especially if rea has already been used), so once again, you would have to add many missing letters to turn this into Latin.
If
re ur in rea = Innerhalb der Wunde der Betroffene brenne. (The victim/part burns within the wound.)
then the intervening "frame shift" would probably have the Latin word "ardeat" at the end.
Can we surmise that "rea" refers to [a]r[d]ea[t] and that three letters have been added using M. Hoffman's method? I don't see any way to make so few words into Latin without adding letters.
The affected part or victim can be expressed in a number of ways in Latin, but two common ways would be vulnus or victimas/victimam (depending on how the sentence is phrased) and I don't see anything in re ur in rea that might expand into either word (especially if rea has already been used), so once again, you would have to add many missing letters to turn this into Latin.