Voynich decoded completely

[-JKP-]

M. Hoffman: "A degree in science is essential to accept the frameshifts/syntax movements; although some pages do not follow that rule, which might be due to the fact that Voynich is written by at least four different authors, and all of them obtain a different style."

For those who are not familiar with this phrase, a frame shift (in genetics) refers to a mutation that alters an expected sequence. It can be either an insertion or deletion. If it occurs early in the sequencing process, the alteration may lead to greater discrepancies later in the sequence.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

This is different from the way the phrase is used in the social sciences, where it refers to the environment, influences, or psychological impact of the way choices, actions, or decisions are "framed".

It is also different from the way the phrase is used in linguistics, where a "frame" is similar to the concept in social sciences, and refers to a knowledge base (social, cultural, and linguistic) through which linguistic communications evolve and are learned and shared.

Clearly, M. Hoffman is referring to the definition as it is used in genetics.

-----
So how do we interpret the concept of a frame shift, as it is used in genetics, in relation to the VMS?

• To begin with, M. Hoffmann has posted a chart for a substitution code in the bottom right corner that relates each VMS glyph to one, two or three letters in Latin.
  
• This substitution code has then been used to transliterate the Voynich glyphs into syllables like re ur in rea, which is then interpreted to the German phrase for "Within the wound, the affected [part] burns."
  

"re ur in rea" is clearly not Latin vocabulary or grammar (nor is the rest of the "translation"), so we have to assume that another step is involved, one that he terms a "frame shift", which would imply that letters have been inserted or deleted to create a translation.


This final and crucial step, where one goes from nonsense syllables to readable text, has not been illustrated. To enable others to understand and substantiate the method, the "frame shift" process needs to be demonstrated. Otherwise the solution is no different from anagram solutions, where liberties are taken with the letters to turn the text into something meaningful.