But these words don't mean anything.
You have transliterated and translated them as follows:
dilez(envoys) v(from,of) imoro (worthy immortality)doad (got) ilo (beyond). amesdo (The outside was) tulo (guarded by) ela (the damneds). nesoldo (Postmortem garden) les (of the fairs) vims (and braves,) vol (cannot be) amsrox (entered) vimsfo (by blissfuls). ameshes (Knit) ameslo (by spirits) amelo (in the tavern). amelo (In the tavern) vi (they found) vilo (miserables) ela (damneds) azlo (who whispered![[Image: smile.png]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/smilies/smile.png)
dogu (in principle) viro (men) am (theirself) sro (for entry) amoro (must pay). amoro (Paid) viro (men) vslo (by purse) dilox (obsessed) diz (denars) vilaes (governor) vildo (of wilderness)....
But I cannot find the words "dilez" or "amesdo" or "nesoldo" or "amsrox" or "vimsfo" or "ameshes" or "ameslo" or "azlo" together in any language, including the Slavic languages. One can coincidentally find a few of them scattered around in Japanese, Spanish, Frisian, French, and Igbo, but many are not words at all and they don't appear to be from the same language group.
How did you get from "dilox" to "obsessed"? and from "amsrox" to "entered"?
--------------------------------------------
Oh wait a minute! I remember now. You introduced this on the other thread by saying it was polyglot, root words of many different languages:
I'm sorry, but that opens a can of worms. Even nonsense text with a reasonable vowel-consonant balance can be interpreted into something vaguely meaningful if we are allowed to choose any language we want for each syllable. That's one-way cipher-land and very subjective.
You have transliterated and translated them as follows:
dilez(envoys) v(from,of) imoro (worthy immortality)doad (got) ilo (beyond). amesdo (The outside was) tulo (guarded by) ela (the damneds). nesoldo (Postmortem garden) les (of the fairs) vims (and braves,) vol (cannot be) amsrox (entered) vimsfo (by blissfuls). ameshes (Knit) ameslo (by spirits) amelo (in the tavern). amelo (In the tavern) vi (they found) vilo (miserables) ela (damneds) azlo (who whispered
dogu (in principle) viro (men) am (theirself) sro (for entry) amoro (must pay). amoro (Paid) viro (men) vslo (by purse) dilox (obsessed) diz (denars) vilaes (governor) vildo (of wilderness)....But I cannot find the words "dilez" or "amesdo" or "nesoldo" or "amsrox" or "vimsfo" or "ameshes" or "ameslo" or "azlo" together in any language, including the Slavic languages. One can coincidentally find a few of them scattered around in Japanese, Spanish, Frisian, French, and Igbo, but many are not words at all and they don't appear to be from the same language group.
How did you get from "dilox" to "obsessed"? and from "amsrox" to "entered"?
--------------------------------------------
Oh wait a minute! I remember now. You introduced this on the other thread by saying it was polyglot, root words of many different languages:
Quote:"Created from roots of phonetic words of latin (70%), french (10%), english (10%) and rest of the words are italian, spanish, portuges, serb, turkish, and hungarian."
I'm sorry, but that opens a can of worms. Even nonsense text with a reasonable vowel-consonant balance can be interpreted into something vaguely meaningful if we are allowed to choose any language we want for each syllable. That's one-way cipher-land and very subjective.