(03-03-2016, 11:07 AM)ReneZ wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I also consider the likelihood that there is any anagramming involved very small, but I wouldn't rule it out.
I actually consider the likelihood that the text is meaningless greater than that of 'encoding by anagramming'.
I wouldn't rule it out, either. Anagraming was not an uncommon encryption method at the time, but it tended to be consistent, not by-convenience-to-make-a-word-the-eager-codebreaker-knows-style anagraming. It was like pig-Latin, applied more-or-less the same way to each word or conceptual grouping.

