14-10-2017, 09:23 AM
I think the Lockerby transcription is wrong, but I cant‘t believe it is a coincidence that most of the ms. is written in readable Latin letters or script and the EVA P does look like an ornate Latin P, I suppose that was the reason for the EVA inventors to name it P and I would like to have an explanation why it is not a P. Why not take the ms. at face value which would include Latin as language. I think it is a great mistake to depend on statistics which depend on not confirmed transcriptions. And again the ugly question: why are the cryptographers not able to decrypt a 15th c. cypher.