26-02-2016, 01:22 AM
Hi Torsten, I don't have an iphone, so I can't download it.
However, I have read your work and it's not an hypothesis. You have only described what is happening in the text and not explained it--you yourself corrected me that your "rules" were actually a description. They cannot be used to generate the text, only describe what the writer himself was doing. I then asked you about the rigid structure of Voynich words and its origin, and your reply was that it was whatever the writer wished to do. You need to explain the word structure with reference to something more solid than that.
However, I have read your work and it's not an hypothesis. You have only described what is happening in the text and not explained it--you yourself corrected me that your "rules" were actually a description. They cannot be used to generate the text, only describe what the writer himself was doing. I then asked you about the rigid structure of Voynich words and its origin, and your reply was that it was whatever the writer wished to do. You need to explain the word structure with reference to something more solid than that.