[Interview] An interview with Stephen Bax

[davidjackson]

Nick, while I defend your right to a droit de responder, I do feel that both parties here are allowing their personal animosity to cloud their judgement when discussing the other.

I'd suggest that you both have very valid points to make and it's a shame they aren't being discussed here. And to be frank, again we're falling into another tiresome Voynich he said, you did, they were influenced flame war. 

So let's break with this Voynich tradition and start afresh!

How about you both shake hands and make up, as professionals in the field? Then we can all work together - critiquing each others work, without criticising.

And Nick, you can organise another Voynich pub meet, Bax can come over and I'll get the first round in. Who knows what research breakthroughs we could all make together after a couple of amiable pints of old spot?