When going over "feminine" herbs, I was able to match most to a list found here:
Pseudo-Dioscorides' "Ex Herbis Femininis" and Early Medieval Medical Botany
Author(s): John M. Riddle
Source: Journal of the History of Biology, Vol. 14, No. 1 (Spring, 1981), pp. 43-81
Published by: Springer
Stable URL: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
A few plants in this section are still problematic:
41v pontafilos, trifolia
44v bouiantos
46r inantes?
46v text missing?
49r romoys
50v loniasos
53v papau? agste? frias?
61v gelocia
Plants from Riddle's "feminine plant list" which I have not assigned are the following:
13. Sticas
21. flommos
26. melena
33. aizos
40. ficios, hecios, alcidiabios
46. moecon
69. Lachnis
70. Abrotonum
71. aparine, filantropos
Also, Marco has started on the "standard" Apuleius part. Is there also like a standard plant list here that can be used for reference?
Pseudo-Dioscorides' "Ex Herbis Femininis" and Early Medieval Medical Botany
Author(s): John M. Riddle
Source: Journal of the History of Biology, Vol. 14, No. 1 (Spring, 1981), pp. 43-81
Published by: Springer
Stable URL: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
A few plants in this section are still problematic:
41v pontafilos, trifolia
44v bouiantos
46r inantes?
46v text missing?
49r romoys
50v loniasos
53v papau? agste? frias?
61v gelocia
Plants from Riddle's "feminine plant list" which I have not assigned are the following:
13. Sticas
21. flommos
26. melena
33. aizos
40. ficios, hecios, alcidiabios
46. moecon
69. Lachnis
70. Abrotonum
71. aparine, filantropos
Also, Marco has started on the "standard" Apuleius part. Is there also like a standard plant list here that can be used for reference?