06-05-2017, 10:05 PM
(06-05-2017, 10:01 PM)coded wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I see what your saying, but maybe your we are both right and wrong. What I mean is if you read my other bottom post. Duke Ercole could have been privy to the Alberti cipher yet used it in Latin without the VMS glyphs for messengers which were delivered in cipher text for strategic use. Of course both user and recipients had the cipher disks with the shift and same letters around the disk. All that was need for the message delivered was in cipher text.
Later on Ercole wrote a memoir and changed it to VMS like I have done on the disk and the Latin words I'm using are high frequency or low frequency which match. Perhaps Ercole did not care to ever read his autobiography. All speculation for now and I know you guys don't like it but traditional methods have failed and my out the box approach may prove correct.
Oh nonsense. You ARE using out-of-the box methods. You're not even doing the conversion yourself, you're using utilities on the Web, both for the Gematria attempt and for this attempt. How more "out of the box" can you get than using an Internet utility available to billions of people?
There's nothing original about this method, and your application of it is sloppy. Sorry, you can't convince me that you know in advance that it's Latin just because you are shoehorning random Latin words onto your wheel by creating many different options for each glyph and getting a few nongrammatical phrases out of it.