05-02-2016, 07:36 AM
In the algorithm for "ovary" I did not interjected "branch" with an apostrophe.
п’89 (46) – H*п’89 (6) – оH*п’89 (1) - 4oH*п’89 (4), *Р*п’89 (1) – о*Р*п’89 (1), 8п’89 (2), ояН*п’89 (1).
In the algorithm for "pedicel" I wrote such a "branch" thin print.
Note the green "way" of algorithm. This 17 description of the options of one-word. It is only external changes. There are 6 (or 5) internal changes. “по89”, “па89” (1), “пп89” (1), “п989” (2), “пS89” (3), “псс89”(cc=u?) (59).
Very similar to the simple enumeration (game) of characters.
Counterfeiting?
I believe that the apostrophe is a symbol of the mechanical action. That is the word "п'oя" translated crumpled (minced) leafs. If the apostrophe is written a bottom, I translate by the verb.
f93r 15 line, the first word "(,)поя" - "to chop leaves"
“по” - surface “п” water “о” . п’о - stir, shakem.
п’89 (46) – H*п’89 (6) – оH*п’89 (1) - 4oH*п’89 (4), *Р*п’89 (1) – о*Р*п’89 (1), 8п’89 (2), ояН*п’89 (1).
In the algorithm for "pedicel" I wrote such a "branch" thin print.
Note the green "way" of algorithm. This 17 description of the options of one-word. It is only external changes. There are 6 (or 5) internal changes. “по89”, “па89” (1), “пп89” (1), “п989” (2), “пS89” (3), “псс89”(cc=u?) (59).
Very similar to the simple enumeration (game) of characters.
Counterfeiting?
I believe that the apostrophe is a symbol of the mechanical action. That is the word "п'oя" translated crumpled (minced) leafs. If the apostrophe is written a bottom, I translate by the verb.
f93r 15 line, the first word "(,)поя" - "to chop leaves"
“по” - surface “п” water “о” . п’о - stir, shakem.

