Rene: An alternate explanation is that the book we see now has been made by a team of copyists. Since their job was to reproduce any originals as closely as possible, they may have been fluent in both the script and the imagery. That would allow any one of them to produce this by himself.
Another option is that the whole last page was known to remain blank and was used for various scribbles. I am not as convinced as you are that the text here is supposed to be "main body" and that the drawings are true marginalia that belong with them.
(By the way, a couple of respondents have opted to leave some questions open, so if you want you can still participate in the "2016 snapshot"
)
Sam: our posts crossed. That seems like a very relevant observation and another argument in favor of images and text matching.
Another option is that the whole last page was known to remain blank and was used for various scribbles. I am not as convinced as you are that the text here is supposed to be "main body" and that the drawings are true marginalia that belong with them.
(By the way, a couple of respondents have opted to leave some questions open, so if you want you can still participate in the "2016 snapshot"
)Sam: our posts crossed. That seems like a very relevant observation and another argument in favor of images and text matching.
![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)