Duplicates have been removed:
WD 4 (duplicate of MK 65). Wladimir was the only one who had a rating entered (WD 4: 1 vs. MK 65: 2). No comments entered.
WD 6 (duplicate of ThP 4). Wladimir was the only one who had a rating entered and it matched the one on ThP 4. No comments entered.
Comments comparison and the individual comments sheets have been accordingly adjusted.
All matches in the rating sheet have been checked and no other duplicates found.
Question: when I use the green arrows for sorting, will this only affect the way I see the document (i.e. leave it unsorted for others)?
Also, I am currently transcribing the rest of ELV's notebooks with Marco, and she tentatively suggests You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view. - f102r. I don't remember whether this was included already?
[
attachment=7870]
My original list I haven't shared. What I did originally is I made a list of the 3 or 4 closest matches for each herb then I looked to see if any of them could possibly match if not I did not add this herb to the list of matches otherwise I close the best match.
This plant may well be an instance where I thought there was a better match.
I couldn't find any You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view. in the document, though I used the search function and I'm not sure how well that works. I would probably include this match though. If you ignore the jarring color difference, I find the similarities strong enough for consideration (though far from perfect).
I am pretty sure that I matched the small plant. (I can link to my original match list??)
I see, you matched it to You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view. , which makes sense and should probably be the preferred match. You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view. does have the lines in the roots going for it, while You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view. has hairy roots, but that is its only advantage. The small-plant root kind of looks like a combination of these two.
(06-11-2023, 11:42 AM)Koen G Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Question: when I use the green arrows for sorting, will this only affect the way I see the document (i.e. leave it unsorted for others)?
The green arrows are for filtering to narrow the data displayed and yes, if you don't clear the filter when done (i.e. clear it then click select all so all the data is once again displayed), then the filtered view is what the next person editing will see. But that is an easy fix and it's obvious when filtering is in use. If one were to re-sort the data instead of using the filter, then that would be more difficult to fix and might even require reverting to a previous version of the workbook (re-sorting is also visible to others accessing the workbook). But I think only you and I can re-sort the data.
(06-11-2023, 01:10 PM)Koen G Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I couldn't find any You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. in the document, though I used the search function and I'm not sure how well that works. I would probably include this match though. If you ignore the jarring color difference, I find the similarities strong enough for consideration (though far from perfect).
The easiest way to find if a particular folio is already referenced is by filtering column E (VN Folio Browser) because that column contains all the folio numbers referenced in the ratings sheet. This is how I found the duplicates. First, clear the filter, then type "f28v" in the search field and a list of matches will appear below, which in this case is none. If you only type in "f28" without the "v", you will see that You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view. is in the sheet but not f28v.
[
attachment=7872]
David has fixed the Folio Browser so that it now contains f87v, which was missing previously. There were 3 rows in the ratings sheet that were affected by this but I have updated the links and tested them and they're working.