I repeat:
Number 1 you have to make some sense out of the whole VMS paragraph and develop a rhythm and correlation to its overall meaning. Also it should fit the time period of 1443-44. Thomas's example is very brief from You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view. and it does not take into account f1r's entire meaning.
(03-12-2016, 05:21 AM)stellar Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I repeat:
Number 1 you have to make some sense out of the whole VMS paragraph and develop a rhythm and correlation to its overall meaning. Also it should fit the time period of 1443-44. Thomas's example is very brief from You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. and it does not take into account f1r's entire meaning.
I posted 25 consecutive words - you have images in this thread which are not that long, but you call them proof. Why is mine not?
Also, I said that I am claiming Nostradamus wrote this paragraph. If he saw the future, it doesn't matter if he didn't live in the time period of the lunar landing.
Mr. Coon,
Thanks for your efforts and I know that was a huge job, but it does not convey structure and meaning like what I have done with the cipher plus your time period from the 15th century is way off. If I found a better way to pin down the words than people could report the same translation and I know that's a problem.
Your use of grammar which I know you have was not applied!
(03-12-2016, 05:31 AM)stellar Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Mr. Coon,
Thanks for your efforts and I know that was a huge job, but it does not convey structure and meaning like what I have done with the cipher plus your time period from the 15th century is way off. If I found a better way to pin down the words than people could report the same translation and I know that's a problem.
Your use of grammar which I know you have was not applied!
Regarding my grammar: Everything is subject-verb-object, and all the verbs are conjugated to the correct person. By contrast, in your own translations you are fine with "O fish from small boat with dirty me overlooker our buoy it deception" (post 1 in this thread). There is not even a verb in that sentence, let alone a correctly conjugated one. Why the double standard?
(03-12-2016, 05:40 AM)ThomasCoon Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. (03-12-2016, 05:31 AM)stellar Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Mr. Coon,
Thanks for your efforts and I know that was a huge job, but it does not convey structure and meaning like what I have done with the cipher plus your time period from the 15th century is way off. If I found a better way to pin down the words than people could report the same translation and I know that's a problem.
Your use of grammar which I know you have was not applied!
Regarding my grammar: Everything is subject-verb-object, and all the verbs are conjugated to the correct person. By contrast, in your own translations you are fine with "O fish from small boat with dirty me overlooker our buoy it deception" (post 1 in this thread). There is not even a verb in that sentence, let alone a correctly conjugated one. Why the double standard?
I moved away from the Welsh ideas and I know the VMS decodes to English. Remember our Golden Age principle alphabet that Satan refers too. It's as if he knew his cipher would be cracked.
Dear forum, perhaps we should hold each other to the same standards. If dear Stellar does not find the grammar in Mister Coon's post acceptable, then he should not post ungrammatical things either. And if he does post ungrammatical things, then he must allow them in other people's posts. Would that work, friends?
(03-12-2016, 05:08 AM)ThomasCoon Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I claim that the red blotch on You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. is an eagle. I can make a "decryption" about the moon landing ("The Eagle has landed"), and JFK's speech which got the US to fund NASA and led to the July 1969 landing. Our win in the space-race caused other nations to doubt communist superiority, and the Voynich scribe (who must have been a prophet like Nostradamus) knew all that, because the Gematria method clearly says:
1) You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. 2) You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. 3) You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. 4) You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. 5) You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. 6) You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. 7) You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. [lunar contact] 8) You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. 9) You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. 10) You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
11) You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view., 12) You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. 13) You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. 14) You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. 15) You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. 16) You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. 17) You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. 18) You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
19) You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. 20) You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. 21) You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. 22) You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. 23) You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. 24) You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. 25) You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. (the name of the Apollo 11 lunar module)
What do you think Stellar? I used your exact method and posted all my work. You say the devil wrote the VMS, I say it was Nostradamus. Gematria says that we're both right at the same time. That means there's a problem with Gematria: the system doesn't give just one answer; it gives multiple results that contradict each other.
A good test before claiming that you've found the answer to the VMS is asking: can my system produce multiple answers? Or is the devil (or John Dee) the one and only answer that my method produces? That will be a good litmus test to see if you are correct. Indeed, it is a good test to perform to decide if your solutions are fit to publish.
Dear Witch,
Do you think my whole method is incorrect and I have not even translated one word from the VMS? Can you claim 100% yes or no?
(03-12-2016, 05:56 AM)stellar Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. (03-12-2016, 05:40 AM)ThomasCoon Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Regarding my grammar: Everything is subject-verb-object, and all the verbs are conjugated to the correct person. By contrast, in your own translations you are fine with "O fish from small boat with dirty me overlooker our buoy it deception" (post 1 in this thread). There is not even a verb in that sentence, let alone a correctly conjugated one. Why the double standard?
I moved away from the Welsh ideas and I know the VMS decodes to English. Remember our Golden Age principle alphabet that Satan refers too. It's as if he knew his cipher would be cracked.
But it seems the devil-written Gematria decipherments are also ungrammatical:
"Banking line, Italy hast fame, Dante to Florence a poet to the end. Rome agreed writer due sum of money; The Divine Fire, wise poem."
No matter how you insert punctuation, you still cannot form a grammatical sentence. If my work is ungrammatical, so is yours.
Thomas Coon:
Your not being fair you just cherry picked leaving out some word.
Coon Wrote:
Quote:But it seems the devil-written Gematria decipherments are also ungrammatical:
"Banking line hast fame, Dante to Florence a poet to the end. Rome agreed writer due sum of money the Divine Fire wise poem."
No matter how you insert punctuation, you still cannot form a grammatical sentence. If my work is ungrammatical, so is yours.
The cipher words exactly:
1) You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. 2) You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view., 3) You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. 4) You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. 5) You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view., 6) You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. 7) You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. 8) You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
9) ae 10) You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. 11) You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.. 12) You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. 13) You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. 14) You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. 15) You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
16) You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.; 17) You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. 18) You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. 19) You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
Stellar, I apologize, I did leave out a single word (Italy). But it is still ungrammatical.