MarcoP > 11-09-2016, 09:21 AM
(09-09-2016, 10:22 AM)ReneZ Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Going back many years, there used to be a statement about the word spaces along the following argument:
given that the label words should be individual words, and they primarily tend to appear in the main text separated by spaces, it seems that the spaces are real.
The problem is that I have never seen anyone really demonstrating this.
This would be a bit of work, but not too difficult to do and it might really tell us something.
All labels can be matched with a version of the main text from which all spaces have been removed.
One can then see how many labels are not found at all, and for the remainder whether there is indeed a preference for them to reoccur separated by spaces.
Depending on the result, the situation could of course not be entirely clear.
Koen G > 11-09-2016, 10:05 AM
Emma May Smith > 11-09-2016, 11:17 AM
ReneZ > 11-09-2016, 12:35 PM
Anton > 11-09-2016, 12:58 PM
MarcoP > 11-09-2016, 01:03 PM
(11-09-2016, 12:58 PM)Anton Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.What I would add to this is quite high density of labels in the folio space. Job's tool has a special request to "plot" labels.
Anton > 11-09-2016, 01:08 PM
MarcoP > 11-09-2016, 01:27 PM
(11-09-2016, 01:08 PM)Anton Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.This should be used with caution though, because the approach to "label" is quite formal - e.g. all You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. stuff is also considered "labels". But, nonetheless, the density observed suggests highly conspected nature of the text.
Koen G > 11-09-2016, 01:55 PM
MarcoP > 11-09-2016, 03:50 PM
(11-09-2016, 01:55 PM)Koen Gh. Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Marco, I wonder if there would be a difference in these statistics if the labels are considered section by section. Is that something you can check easily?