• Options
• Login
• Desktop Style

Theory: perhaps the letters do not have phonemic content?

• Index

  • The Voynich Ninja
  • Voynich Research
  • Theories & Solutions
  • Theory: perhaps the letters do not have phonemic content?
• Theory: perhaps the letters do not have phonemic content?

• RE: Theory: perhaps the letters do not have phonemic content?

  Jorge_Stolfi > 11-07-2026, 02:23 AM

  (10-07-2026, 04:17 PM)ololololo Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Jorge Stolfi compared the recipe section with Shennong Bencao, and he got something. But I do not know if this comparison makes sense.

  Well, at this point I think that comparisons with anything else do not make any sense. 
  
  All the best, --stolfi

• RE: Theory: perhaps the letters do not have phonemic content?

  ololololo > 13-07-2026, 06:52 PM

  (10-07-2026, 11:19 AM)oshfdk Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.If its topic turns out to be about summoning demons, divine revelations or plant magic rituals, the impracticality could be an essential part of the process.

  I was thinking at my leisure...
  The problem with the theory of artificial language is that there is no proper methodology. If this is indeed an old conlang, then logically, the content of VMS is probably mystical, but more so with an alchemical twist. Therefore, it is more likely to be an alchemical language rather than a philosophical one.
  If this is the case, then I assume that this language is very limited and incomplete compared to other languages, but it is also rigidly functional, meaning that it can be used to describe what is described in VMS.
  It would be possible to study the functionality of such a language, but this job is definitely not for me...

• RE: Theory: perhaps the letters do not have phonemic content?

  oshfdk > 13-07-2026, 07:46 PM

  (13-07-2026, 06:52 PM)ololololo Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.The problem with the theory of artificial language is that there is no proper methodology. If this is indeed an old conlang, then logically, the content of VMS is probably mystical, but more so with an alchemical twist. Therefore, it is more likely to be an alchemical language rather than a philosophical one.
  If this is the case, then I assume that this language is very limited and incomplete compared to other languages, but it is also rigidly functional, meaning that it can be used to describe what is described in VMS.

  
  Be careful, this is a sure way towards a Procedural Structural-Semantical Framework for Functional Transformative Alchemical Computation with Robust Verifiable Results achieving Positive Coverage of Over 76% of the Text (link to Zenodo).

• RE: Theory: perhaps the letters do not have phonemic content?

  ololololo > 13-07-2026, 08:05 PM

  (13-07-2026, 07:46 PM)oshfdk Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

  (13-07-2026, 06:52 PM)ololololo Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.The problem with the theory of artificial language is that there is no proper methodology. If this is indeed an old conlang, then logically, the content of VMS is probably mystical, but more so with an alchemical twist. Therefore, it is more likely to be an alchemical language rather than a philosophical one.
  If this is the case, then I assume that this language is very limited and incomplete compared to other languages, but it is also rigidly functional, meaning that it can be used to describe what is described in VMS.

  
  Be careful, this is a sure way towards a Procedural Structural-Semantical Framework for Functional Transformative Alchemical Computation with Robust Verifiable Results achieving Positive Coverage of Over 76% of the Text (link to Zenodo).

  Fortunately, that's not a problem for me.  
  Moreover, I don't think it's possible to translate this language; we can only infer its properties.
• Next Oldest Next Newest