Jimmy123 > 15-06-2026, 06:26 AM
Fabrizio Salani > 15-06-2026, 07:31 AM
(15-06-2026, 04:44 AM)asteckley Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I don't know if it can be of any help, but here's a scan I made from the original copy I have of the Scientific American article from May 28, 1921, about Roger Bacon's encrypted manuscript, which, after W.M. Voynich's death, took his name.(15-06-2026, 04:13 AM)ReneZ Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(14-06-2026, 11:55 PM)asteckley Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.but my understanding has always been that no plausible evidence was ever offered, by Wilfrid or anyone else, to connect the manuscript to Roger Bacon.
Whether or not his arguments were plausible is of course a different question. He managed to convince a lot of people.
The idea that this is not a Bacon MS really only gained traction after Voynich's death.
People supporting him (and Newbold) included You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. , You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. , You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
So you are saying that those people expressed concurrence with Wilfrid's claim that Bacon was the author?
(Where?)
Jorge_Stolfi > 15-06-2026, 08:54 AM
(15-06-2026, 04:13 AM)ReneZ Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.People supporting him (and Newbold) included You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. , You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. , You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
ReneZ > 15-06-2026, 09:51 AM
(15-06-2026, 04:44 AM)asteckley Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.So you are saying that those people expressed concurrence with Wilfrid's claim that Bacon was the author?
(Where?)
ReneZ > 8 hours ago