ololololo > 30-07-2026, 07:37 PM

oshfdk > 30-07-2026, 08:40 PM
(30-07-2026, 07:37 PM)ololololo Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.@oshfdk, you asked me to use an algorithm to encrypt some large text. I asked Gemini (the author of the code) and tried to apply large passages to it myself. It works, you can use it
I tried to encrypt Shakespeare's Sonnet 18:
(30-07-2026, 07:37 PM)ololololo Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.What exactly is difficult about this cipher? Recognizing some letters and deciphering anagrams. Speaking of complexity, I think we need to consider that our decrypter knows all the rules of the cipher. His only obstacle is anagrams.
ololololo > 30-07-2026, 08:49 PM
(30-07-2026, 08:40 PM)oshfdk Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.This certainly doesn't look like Voynichese with repeats like a a iin iin and similar. If this was to run statistical tests,You don't understand the cipher.
(30-07-2026, 08:40 PM)oshfdk Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.It's good you confirm there is an obstacle.By the way, Gemini himself had a negative opinion about this cipher, saying that it would take too long to decrypt a large text if it was done manually.
ololololo > 30-07-2026, 08:55 PM
oshfdk > 30-07-2026, 09:01 PM
(30-07-2026, 08:49 PM)ololololo Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.You don't understand the cipher.
His task is not to reproduce the text itself, but rather to reconstruct the supposed encryption algorithm. In other words, to let you know what Voynichese means to me.
For statistical texts, I need to work with nulls. I'm trying to achieve this with Gemini.
ololololo > 30-07-2026, 09:25 PM
(30-07-2026, 09:01 PM)oshfdk Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.As I said, a similar result can be achieved.(30-07-2026, 08:49 PM)ololololo Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.You don't understand the cipher.
His task is not to reproduce the text itself, but rather to reconstruct the supposed encryption algorithm. In other words, to let you know what Voynichese means to me.
For statistical texts, I need to work with nulls. I'm trying to achieve this with Gemini.
It is true that I don't understand what you are trying to achieve. As far as I understand, you think this cipher may be similar to the cipher used for the Voynich manuscript, but what makes you think so? I mean if it produced some close resemblance to Voynichese, this would be an argument in its favour. But it doesn't in its present state.
oshfdk > 30-07-2026, 10:25 PM
(30-07-2026, 09:25 PM)ololololo Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.As I said, a similar result can be achieved.
(30-07-2026, 09:25 PM)ololololo Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I don't understand the direction of your criticism either. Are you dissatisfied with the theory in general or with this particular cipher?
And why do you think my goal is to reproduce the text? I'm showing you how to create such a text.
ololololo > 31-07-2026, 07:33 AM
(30-07-2026, 10:25 PM)oshfdk Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.If it's not to reproduce the statistics of the Voynich MS and not to attempt deciphering the Voynich MS,It's still a long way off. But at least the goal now is to show that Roman numerals have the same effect and look similar.
(30-07-2026, 10:25 PM)oshfdk Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Until it's reliably achieved, this remains to be seen.Exactly. But for now, we have what we have.
oshfdk > 31-07-2026, 09:04 AM
ololololo > 31-07-2026, 09:47 AM
(31-07-2026, 09:04 AM)oshfdk Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view."show that Roman numerals have the same effect and look similar."As I understand it, you want the perfect result right away.
But I dont think you show anything of sorts? I mean, there are different ways to demonstrate that A looks similar to B. You just show A and say "look, it's simlar to B", while it's not, as least not to me and judging by general lack of interest not to many other people either. Same thing as happening in the Bavarian thread, I think. If you don't want to run statistical tests yet, ok, but maybe at least show how you can automatically produce some text (say, 500 characters) that we won't be able to identify among three samples of Voynichese.
(31-07-2026, 09:04 AM)oshfdk Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.as least not to me and judging by general lack of interest not to many other people either.Okay, I'm going to delete my account due to a lack of interest in my versions.

(31-07-2026, 09:04 AM)oshfdk Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.If you don't want to run statistical tests yet, okHow?