• Options
• Login
• Desktop Style

[split] Nexuslite's solution that will not be shared

• Index

  • The Voynich Ninja
  • Voynich Research
  • Theories & Solutions
  • The Slop Bucket
  • [split] Nexuslite's solution that will not be shared
• [split] Nexuslite's solution that will not be shared

• [split] Nexuslite's solution that will not be shared

  nexuslite > 19-03-2026, 11:48 PM

  (12-03-2026, 04:49 PM)quimqu Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Do you think that, from the perspective of text analysis, it is still possible to go further?

  
  It is possible to go much further on text analysis. I have my solution that I will never share on this forum because the vultures will rip it apart. I can produce clean text across the entire book. Whether it is an AI hallucination or not doesn't really matter to me. Every day I get more value out of the book and learn even more about it and that is all that is important to me.

• [split] Nexuslite's solution that will not be shared

  Ruby Novacna > 21-03-2026, 08:53 AM

  (19-03-2026, 11:48 PM)nexuslite Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. I have my solution that I will never share on this forum because the vultures will rip it apart. 

  
  Hi, Nexuslite!
  Are you calling the members of this forum vultures? 
  It would be simpler to say that you fear negative remarks because you are not sure of your solution.

• RE: Can we go further?

  Aga Tentakulus > 21-03-2026, 09:29 AM

  If you don't put an engine on a test bench, you won't know what it's capable of.
  Will it break down?
  It's more likely that it will simply fall apart on its own.
  Once the rot sets in, even a wooden beam will turn to dust.
  
  Wenn man einen Motor nicht auf den Prüfstand stellt, wird man nicht wissen was er kann.
  Zerreisen?
  Wahrscheinlicher das es einfach von alleine Zerfällt.
  Wenn der Wurm drinnen ist, wird auch ein Holzbalken zu Pulver.

• RE: Can we go further?

  nexuslite > 21-03-2026, 09:19 PM

  (21-03-2026, 08:53 AM)Ruby Novacna Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

  (19-03-2026, 11:48 PM)nexuslite Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. I have my solution that I will never share on this forum because the vultures will rip it apart. 

  
  Hi, Nexuslite!
  Are you calling the members of this forum vultures? 
  It would be simpler to say that you fear negative remarks because you are not sure of your solution.

  
  You just proved my vulture point. I have two people that have already invalidated my idea and I haven't even shared it yet. I took everything into consideration I hit AI with a bunch of blind tests and I have translations of the 5 most important pages of the book. Yes, they are AI hallucinations but they contain valuable information. I have partial working knowledge about how the main wheel functions. I know what language it is, I know how it is encoded, I know what it's about, I have all 10 symbols for the numbers, and I know what daiin means.
  
  However, my main comment was there is more data analysis that can be done. I did the work and found an answer that is producing results. Yes, I used AI. I was also smart enough to know what I was looking at when AI fed me crap. I tried again and again and again until I had stripped away all the mirroring I was seeing and I got down to the base layer. 
  
  Applying entropy vs n-grams like the op of this thread did, is a good analysis, very scientific. It also causes the same mirroring problem where if you throw enough data at it you eventually find what you are looking for.
  
  The book is my validation. Having it return valid translations that go against what I wanted the page to say means I have bypassed the mirror. I want to see everyone's solution not to pick it apart but to analyze it, because maybe there is something I missed. While I have a working solution I haven't gotten down to the absolute beyond a shadow of a doubt solution. The bad translations, the good translations, and entropy vs n-grams data helps me refine what I have. A real researcher takes all the information and applies it rather than invalidating it and throwing it in the slop bucket.

• RE: Can we go further?

  JoJo_Jost > 21-03-2026, 10:43 PM

  @nexuslite If you already see that as an attack, then you really should keep your theory to yourself. It’ll be safe there, but then I wonder why you’re writing about it at all? That doesn’t make any sense, does it? And in your very first post here. That’s quite interesting.
  
  But the answer is simple: part of you wants to publish it because you think it’s your achievement. Relying on AI is a dangerous idea. AI is a lousy friend who can so skilfully lead you into the trap of its lulling reality. And another part of you is afraid that the theory might not actually be a solution after all, that all that work, which could have made you feel special, might just fizzle out in a cloud of logic. A difficult problem... hard to solve. I wouldn’t want to be in your shoes...

• RE: [split] Nexuslite's solution that will not be shared

  tavie > 21-03-2026, 11:23 PM

  Split this from Quimqu's You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. to stop it being derailed.  
  
  I can't imagine, Nexuslite, what you hoped to gain from such a post apart from provoking people here.  But it's clear from your latest post that if you ever changed your mind about never posting your solution here, it would have to go to the Slop Bucket so let's save us all some time.
• Next Oldest Next Newest