Scarecrow > 12-09-2024, 01:59 PM
(12-09-2024, 07:01 AM)Koen G Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.These particular lines, by the way, we cannot read with certainty in any of the three cases.
Koen G > 12-09-2024, 02:35 PM
(12-09-2024, 12:49 PM)pfeaster Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.But when I look at the structure of the "plaintext" portions of You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. in particular, I find myself nudged in the exact opposite direction: what looks like "plaintext" seems to behave more like Voynichese written with Latin characters. Without quibbling over specifics, six + marix + morix + vix + ahia + ma+ria resembles the structure of Voynichese rather closely, even unto its rigid glyph order and repetitive quality. If vords aren't words, then perhaps six, marix, morix, etc. aren't words either, in spite of appearances. We might be seeing Latin characters integrated into a Voynichese structure rather than the other way around.
Aga Tentakulus > 12-09-2024, 03:06 PM
Aga Tentakulus > 12-09-2024, 04:10 PM
julian > 12-09-2024, 06:15 PM
(12-09-2024, 12:49 PM)pfeaster Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view....
But when I look at the structure of the "plaintext" portions of You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. in particular, I find myself nudged in the exact opposite direction: what looks like "plaintext" seems to behave more like Voynichese written with Latin characters. Without quibbling over specifics, six + marix + morix + vix + ahia + ma+ria resembles the structure of Voynichese rather closely, even unto its rigid glyph order and repetitive quality. If vords aren't words, then perhaps six, marix, morix, etc. aren't words either, in spite of appearances. We might be seeing Latin characters integrated into a Voynichese structure rather than the other way around.
Bernd > 12-09-2024, 09:21 PM
hiki33 > 12-09-2024, 10:36 PM
(12-09-2024, 09:21 PM)Bernd Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Even with all the recent exciting MSI developments I think we must not lose ourselves in overly quick conclusions.
Fact is that we do not know what purpose, if any, the marginalia were supposed to serve, with or without Voynichese.
But I find it curious that all of the marginalia appear to be highly ambiguous gibberish. Also they mirror both text and imagery in being cobbled together from a toolkit of relatively common elements, yet overall they don't make any sense. All elements of the VM look and feel familiar, yet are profoundly odd in a bigger context. Is that a mere coincidence?
That said, I'm also skeptical about the "in that case, take goat's milk" translation - or any other for that matter. It may look like it at first glance, but not quite without significant mental gymnastics. Like most VM "theories". I'm afraid it's not that easy. And again - if it was a single ambiguous line of text, fine. But all marginalia are like this. What are the odds that this is just our inability to read an ordinary sentence correctly?
pfeaster > 12-09-2024, 11:54 PM
(12-09-2024, 02:35 PM)Koen G Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.This is a good observation by itself - that part of the marginalia act kind of Voynichese-like. However, is this also true for the parts most closely mixed with Voynichese? E.g. on f116v, the problematic part you point out is a separate section: a prayer or charm or spell or whatever, with crosses on each end and between the words. Latin language plus "spell language". But then on the next line is Voynichese with German language from recipe books ("in that case, take goat's milk").
Aga Tentakulus > 13-09-2024, 12:59 AM
Aga Tentakulus > 13-09-2024, 01:10 AM