Emma May Smith > 29-06-2024, 11:45 AM
(29-06-2024, 11:21 AM)Koen G Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(29-06-2024, 11:05 AM)nablator Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.If everyone has a different interpretation, the results will be meaningless:
Emma May Smith's no opinion = 0%
pedestrian's no opinion = 50-75%
my no opinion = 50%
I assume that most people will gravitate towards 50% when they don't have an opinion either way. So in this case, Emma's use of 0% as "no opinion" is an outlier. And if pedestrian goes over 50%, it means he's more likely to agree than to disagree. I don't think it will have too much of an impact, especially since this is meant as a "for fun" segment and not a peer reviewed publication.
ReneZ > 29-06-2024, 12:22 PM
Ruby Novacna > 29-06-2024, 12:29 PM
Koen G > 29-06-2024, 01:25 PM
Aga Tentakulus > 29-06-2024, 04:07 PM
Bluetoes101 > 30-06-2024, 12:33 AM
(29-06-2024, 10:56 AM)Koen G Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(29-06-2024, 10:13 AM)nablator Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Maybe the question should be asked differently. Instead of "how much do you agree with... ?", it should be "how do you rate the following assertions on a scale of 0 to 100?"
0 = strongly disagree
50 = no opinion
100 = strongly agree
That's a good idea, but a bit late to implement now. Next edition
BessAgritianin > 30-06-2024, 06:56 AM
Koen G > 30-06-2024, 10:36 AM
(28-06-2024, 10:57 PM)Ruby Novacna Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Did you count Cvetka's answer on another thread?
RadioFM > 30-06-2024, 06:02 PM