Koen G > 17-07-2022, 11:35 AM
MarcoP > 17-07-2022, 12:24 PM
(17-07-2022, 11:35 AM)Koen G Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I cannot stress this enough: having both C14 analysis and fashion available to us and overlap so nicely is a tremendous luxury. This is not conclusive, it is double conclusive. Why struggle?
Koen G > 17-07-2022, 12:57 PM
cvetkakocj@rogers.com > 17-07-2022, 01:15 PM
(17-07-2022, 06:18 AM)Aga Tentakulus Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I cannot say whether this spelling was adopted from Slavic.The 'y' meant 'and' in Slavic. It originates in the Old Church Slavonic and was widely used in Slovenian dialects where OCS liturgy was practices. That means in the south-Eastern Carniola. In the Stična Codex from 1442, written by a Czeck monk, the word INU (in various variations of spelling - inu, inv, innu).That was the only 2-page document written in Slovenian and in Latin letters in the 15th century. The next text written in Slovenian and Latin letters were the books written written by the Protestant writers who studied in Tubingen and were later, after being exiled, living in Tubingen. Under the German influence, the used the word INO or INU for 'und'. The books written by the Slovenian writers. like philosopher A. Vremec, who lived in the regions where OCS liturgy was used, use the word 'i' consistently. Eventually, the word INU was used for Slovenian literary language, and has later evolved into 'in'. In the dialectal speech of White Carniola, the word 'i' is still used.
ReneZ > 17-07-2022, 03:16 PM
(17-07-2022, 08:22 AM)Hermes777 Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.As an academic I studied the Dead Sea Scrolls for 20+ years. From that experience I am wary of putting absolute faith ("scientism") in carbon dating, and even more wary of palaeography (which in the case of the Scrolls was a circus.) These are tools, and relatively blunt tools for all of that. I don't feel straightjacketed by them or intimidated by forensics. I'm looking at a 1450s scenario. The carbon dating terminus is 1438. On a small sample from a 600 year old document, I don't regard a leeway of a dozen years fatal to my argument.
Ruby Novacna > 17-07-2022, 03:24 PM
(17-07-2022, 11:35 AM)Koen G Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view....having both C14 analysis and fashion available to us...I spent my morning researching the details of the eagle in heraldry and learned that the position of the wings has changed over time. I think the image of the eagle in 46v has been widely debated, did it help to confirm or deny the date of the manuscript?
ReneZ > 17-07-2022, 03:53 PM
(17-07-2022, 11:35 AM)Koen G Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I cannot stress this enough: having both C14 analysis and fashion available to us and overlap so nicely is a tremendous luxury. This is not conclusive, it is double conclusive. Why struggle?
Juan_Sali > 17-07-2022, 04:43 PM
(17-07-2022, 03:24 PM)Ruby Novacna Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I think the image of the eagle in 46v has been widely debatedWhy an eagle? In my opinion it might be Saint Michael in the apocalypse book of the bible, the flowers on the top form the shape of a You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view..
Ruby Novacna > 17-07-2022, 06:34 PM
(17-07-2022, 04:43 PM)Juan_Sali Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Why an eagle?I never doubted that it was a heraldic You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view., I think, because of its kleestengel.
R. Sale > 17-07-2022, 07:48 PM