ololololo > 17-08-2026, 10:38 AM
ololololo > 17-08-2026, 10:42 AM
Bernd > 17-08-2026, 11:47 AM
(26-05-2026, 10:56 PM)Bernd Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.There is a strange analogy between text and imagery. Both appear to have been cobbled together from a collection of building blocks according to some unknown rules. This is especially true for the VM plants. I agree that at least the majority are composites where roots, stem and flowers have been copied from different sources - and from within the VM. However I think for this reason we can rule out the plants are merely 'shuffled'. The roots were almost certainly copied from another source document than the stem/leaves. The flowers are the weirdest part and appear to be mostly an invention of the VM artist.
But it doesn't stop there. If you look at You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. as well as the weaker correlation between plant drawing styles and scribal hands, you see that each have their own themes and rules, much like the text. And like in the text, there is no 'hard break' between A and B, but no seamless continuum either. Like in the text, some plant themes are repetitive and almost exactly the same plant can be found drawn multiple times, by different scribal hands - or the same.
As with the text, I have no idea if there is some useful information encoded within this imagery, or whether it is meaningless copy-paste. But I believe it shows that both text and plants (and ultimately all imagery) were designed with the same 'mindset'.
bi3mw > 17-08-2026, 12:47 PM
(17-08-2026, 10:38 AM)ololololo Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I have repeatedly noticed that one plant in Botany is similar to another .....
DG97EEB > 17-08-2026, 01:46 PM
bi3mw > 17-08-2026, 02:07 PM
ololololo > 17-08-2026, 09:00 PM
Linda > 18-08-2026, 04:23 AM
(17-08-2026, 10:38 AM)ololololo Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I have repeatedly noticed that one plant in Botany is similar to another, and now I have decided to check all the plants for similarities. Here are the features I have discovered:
Quote:Below, if anything, is my clumsy attempt to depict the general features of the plants mentioned.
As for Herbal B, you can identify not just similarities, but entire families of similar plants. More on this in the next post.
![[Image: Strawberry-Spinach.png]](https://gaiaorganics.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Strawberry-Spinach.png)
maybe the others are things like carnations, marigolds, or chrysanthemums; big frilly flowers?![[Image: TanacetumVulgare.jpg]](https://pfaf.org/Admin/PlantImages/TanacetumVulgare.jpg)
Linda > 18-08-2026, 04:44 AM
(17-08-2026, 09:00 PM)ololololo Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.It might be worth comparing this too...
ololololo > 18-08-2026, 07:26 AM
Linda Wrote:when they have the profile you drew, it could be that you are seeing a 3, 4, 5, 6, or more petaled item depending on your point of view and what the flower looks like in other orientations. Also, one has sepals, the other has a calyx of some sort, so I think you could tell them apart if you could figure out what they are.In real life, these flowers are naturally distinguishable, no matter what. But in the VMS style, they coincide in an unusual way.
Linda Wrote:f51v-f54v-f94r these remind me of clovers, compound. Your drawing is one interpretation, another is that you are seeing petals only along the outside like an aster. Or it could be filled in, like a dandelion.This looks like muscari. Like some kind of very large muscari.
Linda Wrote:Anyway, good idea to gather the traits and see what we can make of them.In any case, I assume that in Herbal A the artist borrowed details from other plants, while in Herbal B they were drawn according to roughly the same scheme.