-JKP- > 30-01-2018, 05:32 AM
DonaldFisk > 31-01-2018, 12:04 AM
(30-01-2018, 05:32 AM)-JKP- Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Usually the first thing I want to look at is the code (and unfortunately, I don't have time to look at their code, at least not any time soon, but I was happy to see it's available for perusal).
Many coders claim "AI technology" when in fact it's not. If it learns and self-modifies, then we're getting into AI territory. If it's a set of rules and a lot of brute-force lookups and processing, not so much.
-JKP- > 31-01-2018, 12:52 AM
-JKP- > 31-01-2018, 09:53 AM
Koen G > 31-01-2018, 11:19 AM
DonaldFisk > 31-01-2018, 02:54 PM
(31-01-2018, 11:19 AM)Koen Gh. Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I still don't understand why some people are mildly positive about this paper. I'm not a coding expert, but I do know that abjad anagramming is a one way cipher. And that plonking your results into google translate is an absolutely embarassing thing to write about in a scientific paper. Am I missing something?
MarcoP > 31-01-2018, 02:57 PM
(31-01-2018, 11:19 AM)Koen Gh. Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I still don't understand why some people are mildly positive about this paper. I'm not a coding expert, but I do know that abjad anagramming is a one way cipher. And that plonking your results into google translate is an absolutely embarassing thing to write about in a scientific paper. Am I missing something?
Anton > 31-01-2018, 03:24 PM
ReneZ > 31-01-2018, 04:03 PM
Koen G > 31-01-2018, 07:45 PM