stellar > 16-12-2016, 10:06 PM
(16-12-2016, 09:53 PM)-JKP- Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(16-12-2016, 09:39 PM)bunny Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I don't mean a humanistic approach, what is logically expected, it's an interpretation of a poetical translation.
Whatever the records or accepted views are, the poem suggests 1903 it was moved to the Vatican.
Bunny
Bunny, did you look at the method for deriving the words? Did you read the previous posts in the thread explaining the number of possible interpretations for just the first three words (about 12,500)?
bunny > 16-12-2016, 11:07 PM
(16-12-2016, 10:06 PM)stellar Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.JKP,(16-12-2016, 09:53 PM)-JKP- Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(16-12-2016, 09:39 PM)bunny Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I don't mean a humanistic approach, what is logically expected, it's an interpretation of a poetical translation.
Whatever the records or accepted views are, the poem suggests 1903 it was moved to the Vatican.
Bunny
Bunny, did you look at the method for deriving the words? Did you read the previous posts in the thread explaining the number of possible interpretations for just the first three words (about 12,500)?
The first three columns of words are only about 600 of them and if you use logic and sentence structure then you arrive at a proper paragraph of sentence or phrase.
Witch Mountain > 17-12-2016, 02:17 AM
(16-12-2016, 01:17 PM)bunny Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(14-12-2016, 09:14 AM)Witch Mountain Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Dear friends, it is also worth noting that "Italy hast fame" is ungrammatical in any time period - it is subject-verb agreement error:
I have (1st person)
Thou hast (2nd person)
He/she/it has or hath (3rd person)
"Italy" would be 3rd person (the country is an "it") but here it is linked with "hast", which is 2nd person.
On the contrary countries were not always "it" and designated a gender, mother Russia, La France, Britannia, Possibly USA via "lady Columbia" (or more recently Uncle Sam), mother India etc. Germany and Wales etc. Fatherland in terms of "land of our fathers", but also motherland of native land may be used interchangeably. Fatherland used in many European/latin origin countries, some Nordic, African and Pakistan also. Places like Sweden, genderless. He/she/it are all 3rd person, but if the author directly addressing the country rather than about it then having a gender, and a more intimate sense of identity and connection to the land, then referring in the 2nd person as "you" rather than "it" is not out of place and poetical.
"Italia" - female, 2nd person, motherland, intimate connection - hast."
Reworded in a clearer expanded manner:
"Italy (Italia) my motherland, thou hast fame..."
Italia, la mia patria, tu hai la fama
Neither ungrammatical, 2nd person feminine - nor so out of place in a not so modern world. In fact it just strengthens the translation as poetical and archaic.
Bunny
ReneZ > 17-12-2016, 09:44 AM
(16-12-2016, 04:53 PM)-JKP- Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(16-12-2016, 02:40 PM)bunny Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.[...]
Voynich was a Jew.
[...]
To convince people that the Vatican Christian stronghold was willing to sell part of its library to W. Voynich, you will have to come up with examples of other similar transactions during that time period.
[...]
bunny > 17-12-2016, 10:40 AM
(17-12-2016, 02:17 AM)Witch Mountain Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.[quote pid='9854' dateline='1481890627']
Thank you for the reply dear bunny. If you want to give Italy any grammatical gender (male, female, neuter) and any level of formality (formal, informal, intimate) I am fine with all that. But the grammatical person (1st 2nd 3rd) is a different matter. In this sentence, it seems clear he is talking about Italy, and its "banking line" (whatever that is). There is nothing to suggest that the speaker is talking to Italy, and if he was it would be very odd in Western European languages (cf. "England are great").
-JKP- > 17-12-2016, 11:40 AM
(17-12-2016, 09:44 AM)ReneZ Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.That Voynich was Jewish is one of these incorrect statements that tend to get propagated in some of the literature, and are hard to eradicate.
Voynich was Christian, or, in his own words: "Cassolic and Agnostic". This is a first hand report from E. Millicent Sowerby,
"Rare People and Rare Books, London: Constable, 1967". I show a very short excerpt in the understanding that this falls under fair use.
Arnold Hunt quotes this reference in his recent essay, but I am not sure if he also repeats this statement. The chapter by Millicent Sowerby is a fascinating view into the life of Voynich in the years 1912-1914.
He was buried at the Catholic Gate of Heaven cemetary in Hawthorne (N.Y.). More information about that may be found at the excellent You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. .
His general acquisition of about 30 books that included the Voynich MS is sufficiently documented, though uncertainties remain about some of the more interesting details.
ThomasCoon > 17-12-2016, 03:31 PM
(16-12-2016, 02:19 AM)stellar Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view., You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view., You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.; You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view., You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view., You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view..
ThomasCoon > 17-12-2016, 03:40 PM
(16-12-2016, 10:06 PM)stellar Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(16-12-2016, 09:53 PM)-JKP- Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Bunny, did you look at the method for deriving the words? Did you read the previous posts in the thread explaining the number of possible interpretations for just the first three words (about 12,500)?
The first three columns of words are only about 600 of them and if you use logic and sentence structure then you arrive at a proper paragraph of sentence or phrase.
stellar > 17-12-2016, 05:02 PM
ThomasCoon > 17-12-2016, 05:33 PM