Lament from the Sea, New Method! f2r

[-JKP-]

bunny wrote: And to Stellar your work IS very accurate so don't be put off. 

Bunny, I don't know how you can make a determination that it is accurate without knowing what is actually in the manuscript and without even knowing if there is meaning intended in the text. Even if there is meaning, you don't know which language was used—there are many other languages that bear a closer resemblance to the VMS structure than English.



bunny wrote: I will put the translation and words pulled from his list later today when time.  It will not be the same as Stellar's choice because the manuscript allows different aspects to be seen.  It is factual and given the full word list a whole history could be pulled out.  This is not the mainstream academic approach be warned, but it is no ordinary manuscript, C15th or otherwise.

I also don't know how you can determine that the translation is "factual". In addition to making a number of unsupported assumptions, you have made several pejorative statements about academic approaches and scientific method, but usually it's necessary to understand those methods before you pass judgment on them.