18-12-2016, 10:18 AM
Yes, I think we all agree such methods are improvable in the traditional sense.
An incorrect solution, you mean not a singular correct solution. Historically correct items typed by monkeys unlikely, subconscious knowledge imprinted maybe. Unexplainable also maybe.
Was Newbold wrong?
"It is largely accepted that he knew about these things (somehow) subconsciously."
That's a very unscientific vague opinion from someone who is sure Newbold was are absolutely, maybe, definitely, somehow vaguely knew about it so must be wrong. It seems more like no one could accept he actually came up with those results by unconventional means. Not THE solution, another layer of the puzzle.
Bunny
An incorrect solution, you mean not a singular correct solution. Historically correct items typed by monkeys unlikely, subconscious knowledge imprinted maybe. Unexplainable also maybe.
Was Newbold wrong?
"It is largely accepted that he knew about these things (somehow) subconsciously."
That's a very unscientific vague opinion from someone who is sure Newbold was are absolutely, maybe, definitely, somehow vaguely knew about it so must be wrong. It seems more like no one could accept he actually came up with those results by unconventional means. Not THE solution, another layer of the puzzle.
Bunny