Lament from the Sea, New Method! f2r

[bunny]

P.S. addition to last post.  Some people have synthesisia and experience the world differently literally seeing and manipulating numbers in the air or tasting words, some savants know dates and do instant calculations better than a computer without trying, and people with what are termed language differences such as dyslexia etc. see written language, grammar, word structure and order differently.  I personally don't process written language normally in the same way as the rest, and normal people are not able to grasp what that means or is like to process the world in that way, it is a two way process of frustration for either side.  It would be interesting to know if anyone else who works with methods that are not rigid in output choice has the same issues.  The normal rules and regulations do not bind the mind in the same way as the average person because quite frankly we don't "get it", we see it but it doesn't make sense, but what we do get is a different view of language and written word.  For me it is all much more linked and less compartmentalised, over different languages and over historical change, and when you query the variations and pulling choices out of infinite possible words (though usually methods offer up very small group of possible words) I really don't understand how you don't see the needle, leading to much disbelief and toing and froing on both sides. I know logically you would say that's not how translation, methodology or producing sense works, but I also don't get how you don't get finding results in less rigid methods (really are you kidding?) when it is so simple and clear, though apparently not to normal people.  So I will always be unconventional in approach and struggle to explain why I see something working that is not normally logical. 

Bunny