Lament from the Sea, New Method! f2r

[bunny]

I'm a bit confused, bunny. So we all agree that the system can produce many, many valid sentences. Thomas has shown that he manages to produce narratives over long sections which are grammatically more coherent than "Italy hast". 

But for some reason, the words Stellar chose, out of a literally near-infinite amount of options, are of some special value to you? Do you believe some people are somehow "gifted" to sense the meaning of the text? That some people reach similar conclusions because the text somehow suggests those to them, even though their methods are not scientific? I just want to make sure that we're talking about the same thing here...

I'm not talking about disregarding scientific method and some people work on both aspects.  In similar conclusions I don't mean all the same though some aspects like astronomy and botany may be almost identical.  They are of the same thread is what I'm attempting to say, and I hope to explain that all full when I publish my hypothesis that binds them all.  Throughout history it has been recorded that some people are gifted to sense things but again I don't mean finding results in a consulting the oracle or scrying sense, no magic or whatever involved, more reading the bumps on brail, pulling out what is meant from the mess.  In this non-scientific sense some people can read brail and most can't, most read words in print and if you gave them brail to read with a blindfold on they would be at a loss.  I don't know how to express the differences more at the moment.

The special value you query is part of a much bigger data base of things both in Voynich research attempts and outside of the sphere of it.  Monkey's can type an infinite amount of rubbish, and maybe even Shakespeare but unlikely.  The chances of presenting factual results from chaotic processes has to be very small and there has to be some unifying explanation for the results.  I'm not checking the process or validity of people's methods, just compiling the results. In the past I have run through the process of some and spent time testing them, but it is very time consuming and I don't have time to give to that now, so I have to assume any results are honestly produced by a method someone is working on and testing themselves.  It really is just about the results offered up and that they have more in common than not.

Bunny