Lament from the Sea, New Method! f2r

[bunny]

[quote pid='9744' dateline='1481650426']
Hi Bunny - you are right, different languages do have different grammars, and poetry can leave out grammar. But I advise you to answer this question: Why can stellar's methods produce several outputs? why could his "Welsh numerology" not only produce Welsh, but also Chinese? Why can every "gematria" paragraph produce many valid English paragraphs, as I showed with the moon-landing? If his methods produce only 1 result, that is useful. But if a paragraph can say whatever I want it to, then that is not a solution - it doesn't prove what the really VMS says.

[/quote]

I do agree that it is not in the realm of a set method producing a set one and only output, though his method is far from the first to run along the same lines.  I will be publishing in the near-ish future a hypothesis that covers this aspect of various methods.  For the moment I would see the Welsh numerology as a "tool" of translation and again he is not the first to go along the lines of one VM letter falls into a group of possible English for example, letters, possibly with anagramming that overall fits together like a jigsaw into a sequence, or more than one sequence with one relevant choice.  And of course if something was written in a root language it should be readable in many, even Chinese, again something I will be going into.  It seems to say quite well from "many various sources using many various and not standardly acceptable" what it needs to say to the intended audience. 

My interest in the Welsh is the strong link he has in wanting to look at Welsh which no one else has done as far as I know, he also is looking at English maybe thinking the Welsh is a dead end.  But English and Welsh combined is pointing to a date that the VM may have been moved, which is not information found in the usual historical records. But it's not for me to put words into his mouth and I have to wait and see if he finds anything or not on his own.  To summarise I'm looking at people's results regardless of method or degrees of variation, and looking at the similarities and factualness of them, and Stellar is a current example.  I know you say it doesn't prove what it says when looking at a 1:1 singular back workable solution, but can so many researchers over so much time all be so wrong if they point to the same overall pattern?

Bunny

Bunny