56 minutes ago
Ambiguous symbols like qe and a small t are suitable for your example.
The coincidences you’ve listed below seem very unlikely out of context, I’d like to say. However, we remember that the principle behind the creation of Voynichese symbols is very simple — the symbols consist of a pair of simple strokes, so the coincidences are expected.
Secondly, no significant conclusions can be drawn from such coincidences. The principle of the Voynichese cipher (and, in principle, Voynichese itself, whatever it may be) lies in its verbosity, where two glyphs can be considered as one symbol.
Conclusions can only be drawn within the framework of the hoax theory — the forger might have seen this cipher, liked it, and then started creating the Voynichese from there...
The coincidences you’ve listed below seem very unlikely out of context, I’d like to say. However, we remember that the principle behind the creation of Voynichese symbols is very simple — the symbols consist of a pair of simple strokes, so the coincidences are expected.
Secondly, no significant conclusions can be drawn from such coincidences. The principle of the Voynichese cipher (and, in principle, Voynichese itself, whatever it may be) lies in its verbosity, where two glyphs can be considered as one symbol.
Conclusions can only be drawn within the framework of the hoax theory — the forger might have seen this cipher, liked it, and then started creating the Voynichese from there...