![]() |
|
A possible origin for the EVA "t" glyph? - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Analysis of the text (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-41.html) +--- Thread: A possible origin for the EVA "t" glyph? (/thread-6292.html) |
A possible origin for the EVA "t" glyph? - JustAnotherTheory - 10-11-2026 In Federico de Montefeltro's cipher ledger book (You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view., 1440-1469), several cipher alphabets based on simple substitution are recorded. Take a look at the first one, intended to be used by Sigismondo Pandolfo Malatesta, looks like this: If you take a closer look at the glyph for the letter "x", you might see something familiar: In both cases, the glyph seems to be composed of a "left part" that looks like a 4, and a right part, that looks like a loop. Looking some other ciphers in the ledger, one might notice that it is possible to "construct" such a glyph, looking like an EVA "t", by combining the following two glyphs: The result is an EVA "t"-looking glyph. Could this be the way that the EVA glyph "t" was "assembled"? If yes, then it might encode not one, but two letters in one glyph. ____________________________________________________ PS. There are some other interesting glyphs in this ledger book that are worth a look: RE: A possible origin for the EVA "t" glyph? - DG97EEB - 10-11-2026 RE: A possible origin for the EVA "t" glyph? - Rafal - 10-11-2026 RE: A possible origin for the EVA "t" glyph? - ololololo - 10-11-2026 RE: A possible origin for the EVA "t" glyph? - JustAnotherTheory - 10-11-2026 RE: A possible origin for the EVA "t" glyph? - JoJo_Jost - 10-11-2026 |