[Article] Harvard physicist's take on the VMS

[DG97EEB]

If AI can 'solve' a millennium problem , i don't think its unreasonable to think it could solve voynich.  

However the millennium problems took nearly $20,000,000 in compute, took approaches humans had already identified as likely, and then pushed them across the finish line with brute force. 

My guess is if you dumped enough $ into compute, and gave it ideas discussed over the years in this forum as a starting point, AI as it exists today might already be good enough. The amount of $ needed probably decreases with every model release.

I'm literally doing that.. you can have access to the Voynich Archive via MCP on my signature.. hook it up to fable 5.5 or Astra and have fun... But... It's not gonna solve it...I don't believe it's a computational problem in the end.. I've even tried quantum (you can stand up a quantum computer on AWS) ... What it is very good for however is research.. plug in Exa and Consensus and the archive which covers everything I can find about Voynich including this forum live updated, and it will spot patterns...and will help you pull threads.. but the stats? So far a dead end like everyone else ...