30-08-2026, 10:47 AM
I've finally found the time to read all the way from the start of this intriguing thread. I include anatomy in the very long list of things I'm not an expert in, but I'll share a handful of thoughts that came to my mind along the way...
Firstly, any male who thinks the image at the top-left of You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. (or the other suggestion in post #91) is a phallus... should maybe consider getting a medical check-up?
Is the illustrator deliberately drawing things inaccurately to disguise the meaning? Or is the illustrator perhaps just not very good? One of those options strikes me as the more parsimonious, and is consistent with observations of the rest of the VMS. Either way, it surely makes erroneous matches more likely.
Finally, seeing a number of different possibilities for different illustrations counts against, rather than for, any anatomical theory for me. If everyone saw the same thing, that would make me see it as more plausible.
"Methinks it is like a weasel",
Alan
Firstly, any male who thinks the image at the top-left of You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. (or the other suggestion in post #91) is a phallus... should maybe consider getting a medical check-up?
Is the illustrator deliberately drawing things inaccurately to disguise the meaning? Or is the illustrator perhaps just not very good? One of those options strikes me as the more parsimonious, and is consistent with observations of the rest of the VMS. Either way, it surely makes erroneous matches more likely.
Finally, seeing a number of different possibilities for different illustrations counts against, rather than for, any anatomical theory for me. If everyone saw the same thing, that would make me see it as more plausible.
"Methinks it is like a weasel",
Alan