Voynich's anatomy

[ololololo]

It bothers me because everyone seems to have decided that we will accept this one old interpretation of the quire without any need for contextualization.

Do you mean an anatomical interpretation or something else?
The anatomical interpretation is still the most logical and reliable, along with the balneological and alchemical interpretations. I don’t think that any “anachronisms” (but what’s anachronistic about this? For example, the author could have had organ samples lying on a table or somewhere else, and he simply copied them) will be present.