Voynich's anatomy

[ololololo]

Why not the You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. plus the tongue (on which the nymph is standing)? The problem with this kind of exercise is that once you assume the drawings represent organs then you're going to find similarities to organs, while if you assume the drawings represent scenes from the book of Enoch then you will find similarities with scenes from the book of Enoch

First of all, I don’t deny your comparison. But then it’s unclear why the language is depicted in this way and why something is emanating from it. It’s also unclear what the nymph signifies in this case.
Secondly, Radimir, in his thread, considers all comparisons with the Book of Enoch to be absolutely true. I’m not saying that anatomy is the only correct interpretation of this section.

That the supposedly erect member is pointing the wrong way compared to the supposed scrotum. Like, I can't picture a way this could work.

I wouldn’t say he’s erect.
   
The unnaturally long scrotum can be explained by the fact that the artist stretched it deliberately in order to depict the nymph.