Voynichese is a numeric cipher?

[ololololo]

I tossed a coin and it came up heads, which means the numeric cipher theory is wrong. I think my method is no less reliable than yours

The damn coin!
But again, the text corpus is small. You asked for metrics, and I provided them. It would be better if I gave them to you out of thin air.
Maybe your comments are right, but I think it's better to say what can be done or what needs to be worked on. I'm not a specialist, so I might not know or see what you don't.
As I understand it, your goal is to point out that my version has nothing (in terms of statistical research) and prove that it is very, very wrong. By the way, you don't believe in the Bavarian theory because it has statistical research, and you don't trust it.
I can tell you why I think the idea of a numeric cipher is correct. I can describe how it most likely works and illustrate it with an example of my own mini-cipher. At the same time, I can acknowledge any flaws in my theories if you actually find them and they are significant.
Of course, you would say, "Why is your theory correct and others are not?". But that's my position - I don't know if I'm right or not. And I may never know, so I don't criticize other theories if they are well-founded.
For example, I don't reject either the Bavarian theory, which I find quite complex, or the Chinese theory, which sometimes seems like a big assumption.
After a very, very long time of our discussions here, I still haven't understood what exactly you're not satisfied with. You say that I don't have any statistical evidence that the mini-cipher is similar to Voynichese, and I admit that there isn't any. However, you seem to view this as my surrender.
And remember, @oshfdk, a truly holistic critique includes a suggestion In our case, at least.