29-07-2026, 09:37 PM
After working with the text of pages You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. and f3r, I got the following impression:
1). It's possible that two ciphers were used to encrypt the book - one based on simple substitution and similar to my cipher, and the other might have been related to the wheel method, something like this:
Instead of Arabic numerals, there were Roman numerals, which were later replaced with Voynichese letters. This impression was based on the You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. text. I noticed that the beginning of lines 8,9 and 12,13 contains a small number (dain and daiin). Except for line 7, all previous lines already end with a smaller number.
I was also confused by the sequence: okar oky daiin okchey kokaiin okchol kodchy (f1r.22). Ko cases are quite strange. Perhaps this is a consequence of this.
This could also explain some of the variability of the words. In my examples, the degree of "uniformity" of the words is high. It could also explain the role of the gallows in the cases of sheopchol and shokcheey. Perhaps this is a hint of "turns" or something like that.
But it could be simpler: the numbers on You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. are just not aligned very well. There are still some "decreases" there: ykal ar ytaiin (f1r.1); darain dain (f1r.16). Maybe the author didn't do well at first
2). On f3r, it's most likely a substitution similar to my cipher. There are clear alignments (for example, chor cthom otaldal). cTh, o, and other combinations from my cipher are often seen. Apparently, the algorithm is similar. But I don't know how to choose the right numbers...
In the substitution option, the letter s can be replaced with a space between the words (qokol chololy s cham cthol).
3). It seems to me that the degree of nulls in the text is not as high as I thought. This means that words are numbers in their entirety, and daiin differs from qodaiin in the same way that 5 differs from 15.
4). The possible specificity of the cipher is the ability to write the same number in different ways. Like an and dy in my cipher.
And that's all I've managed to find out so far...
1). It's possible that two ciphers were used to encrypt the book - one based on simple substitution and similar to my cipher, and the other might have been related to the wheel method, something like this:
Instead of Arabic numerals, there were Roman numerals, which were later replaced with Voynichese letters. This impression was based on the You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. text. I noticed that the beginning of lines 8,9 and 12,13 contains a small number (dain and daiin). Except for line 7, all previous lines already end with a smaller number.
I was also confused by the sequence: okar oky daiin okchey kokaiin okchol kodchy (f1r.22). Ko cases are quite strange. Perhaps this is a consequence of this.
This could also explain some of the variability of the words. In my examples, the degree of "uniformity" of the words is high. It could also explain the role of the gallows in the cases of sheopchol and shokcheey. Perhaps this is a hint of "turns" or something like that.
But it could be simpler: the numbers on You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. are just not aligned very well. There are still some "decreases" there: ykal ar ytaiin (f1r.1); darain dain (f1r.16). Maybe the author didn't do well at first
2). On f3r, it's most likely a substitution similar to my cipher. There are clear alignments (for example, chor cthom otaldal). cTh, o, and other combinations from my cipher are often seen. Apparently, the algorithm is similar. But I don't know how to choose the right numbers...
In the substitution option, the letter s can be replaced with a space between the words (qokol chololy s cham cthol).
3). It seems to me that the degree of nulls in the text is not as high as I thought. This means that words are numbers in their entirety, and daiin differs from qodaiin in the same way that 5 differs from 15.
4). The possible specificity of the cipher is the ability to write the same number in different ways. Like an and dy in my cipher.
And that's all I've managed to find out so far...