20-07-2026, 01:03 PM
The word cheody in my mini-code can be obtained by gluing o o o dy (o o o f). The first two o's combine to make che, and then we add ody.
Similarly, you can get some other words, such as chedy. They appear when you encrypt the text (well, as che o dy and che dy, respectively).
The following issues are currently unresolved:
Also, some garbage elements can be inserted directly INSIDE a number. You will still understand that it is null, for example dy - dyty (found on f19r). The combination of yt makes no sense.
Two units (in) can also be changed using garbage gibbets, for example, in - yty (by removing the gibbet, you get yy, which is equivalent to in).
There is plenty of room for "Voynichization"... However, there are no specific rules for secondary encryption that can provide the desired statistics...
However, there are currently no other issues with the cipher. Or I don't see them...
Similarly, you can get some other words, such as chedy. They appear when you encrypt the text (well, as che o dy and che dy, respectively).
The following issues are currently unresolved:
Also, some garbage elements can be inserted directly INSIDE a number. You will still understand that it is null, for example dy - dyty (found on f19r). The combination of yt makes no sense.
Two units (in) can also be changed using garbage gibbets, for example, in - yty (by removing the gibbet, you get yy, which is equivalent to in).
There is plenty of room for "Voynichization"... However, there are no specific rules for secondary encryption that can provide the desired statistics...
However, there are currently no other issues with the cipher. Or I don't see them...

