(07-07-2026, 07:44 PM)ololololo wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.But considering that even though he was smart, he didn't understand cryptology, it still points to the thesis of this post.
What do you mean he didn't understand cryptology? I don't think we know if the author was familiar with the contemporary cryptology.
(07-07-2026, 07:44 PM)ololololo wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.The number of pages does not mean that the cipher must be complex or "perfect". The Codex Seraphinianus has about 360 pages, but this does not mean that it is written in a clear and meaningful language.
I'm sorry, I don't think I understand many of your statements. Are you using an AI translator? (Which is perfectly fine and is allowed by the rules of the forum, as far as I understand.) I don't think we have discussed the complexity of the possible cipher, I think we were discussing whether the cipher was "accurate", and I presume "accurate" means you can follow some well defined rules to successfully decipher it?
I'm not sure how Codex Seraphinianus plays into this, as far as I know, it's an art project, whether it follows some strict logic or not is not very important to its nature.