I like the sleeves one, and I agree with 'wingless' and 'arms pointing forward' as being binary.
Meadowy terrain is harder to judge as binary (is a green floor a meadow?) so I think an effective:
not on meadow / maybe on meadow / on meadow / on meadow with flower(s)
For short hair, I assume the example in your post counts as short, even though it's in a bun of sorts?
long hair / medium/unclear hair / short hair
For a blue dress, I also think a gradient could be worthwhile. Green, or a sort of blueish green is far more blue than red is.
not coloured in / red/no clothing / green/blueish green clothing / blue clothing
For the headgear, I would personally count your example as either a 1 or 1.5. We don't have enough blue on heads to be discounting them on technicalities
My personal opinion would be:
not wearing headwear / wearing headwear 100% unrelated to VMS (crown etc) / wearing headwear / wearing blue headwear
"100% Unrelated headwear" "Headwear" "blue headwear"
We also don't 100% know how the colouring affected the detailing. Note that the shape of the hair in the second and third images are reminiscent of the VMS "hat" shape. Could that have been the hair, and the blue a badly painted hairband/wreath?
And I think for the dress trailing the figure may also have a middle case. For example, does this one count? I would say "kinda", but we can also say "no" if people prefer.
Edit: And I don't know whether facing left is worth tracking, as it does indeed seem to depend on the placement on the page and varies a lot within works, so isn't really a core attribute of the depiction.
Meadowy terrain is harder to judge as binary (is a green floor a meadow?) so I think an effective:
not on meadow / maybe on meadow / on meadow / on meadow with flower(s)
For short hair, I assume the example in your post counts as short, even though it's in a bun of sorts?
long hair / medium/unclear hair / short hair
For a blue dress, I also think a gradient could be worthwhile. Green, or a sort of blueish green is far more blue than red is.
not coloured in / red/no clothing / green/blueish green clothing / blue clothing
For the headgear, I would personally count your example as either a 1 or 1.5. We don't have enough blue on heads to be discounting them on technicalities

My personal opinion would be:
not wearing headwear / wearing headwear 100% unrelated to VMS (crown etc) / wearing headwear / wearing blue headwear
"100% Unrelated headwear" "Headwear" "blue headwear"
We also don't 100% know how the colouring affected the detailing. Note that the shape of the hair in the second and third images are reminiscent of the VMS "hat" shape. Could that have been the hair, and the blue a badly painted hairband/wreath?
And I think for the dress trailing the figure may also have a middle case. For example, does this one count? I would say "kinda", but we can also say "no" if people prefer.
Edit: And I don't know whether facing left is worth tracking, as it does indeed seem to depend on the placement on the page and varies a lot within works, so isn't really a core attribute of the depiction.

