16-11-2016, 11:14 AM
(16-11-2016, 11:01 AM)Ruby Novacna wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.@Stellar
I find your system too complex to be used for such a long manuscript.
The system isn't really that complex. You add up the letters to make a number and assign that to a word of the same number. Essentially a simple concept.
The problem is with re-interpreting something as subjective as a single number that can stand for thousands of words. I suppose in the sense of "decrypting" or reinterpreting it's unwieldy and somewhat complex, but mostly it's just unwieldy.
The problem with the way stellar is doing it is the decision about which language it's in and what it's about has been made before looking up words of the same number. Regardless of what it is, you are going to get a few words, sometimes even many words that "fit". But that doesn't mean any of them are the correct words (or even close to it) because another language or subject can yield just as many "valid" words (words of the same numerical value), which Thomas has already demonstrated with his language example.

