Unexpectedly, I found an essentially perfect example of what I described in previous posts in the manuscript itself. This is f3r:
schey chor chal cham cham cho
This line is exactly what I described as adding a null (which in this case is the initial ch) and splitting the word into its component numbers.
The repetition of cham cham is also elegant in its own way. If am is a number and it appears twice in the encrypted word, then it will appear twice in any ordering (if I arrange the letters in the word morning in alphabetical order, it will become GIMNNOR, with the N duplicated). It seems too, too suspicious to me...
Also, with the help of this page, I can reasonably assume that m = iin. In addition to the fact that it matches a and o, like iin, it appears closer to the end of the line, and it seems to be in cases where iin would not fit. For example, if cham cham were written as chaiin chaiin, cho would not fit.
This may be the trace of the original cipher before it was transformed into Currier A.
It is also worth noting that there is a high probability that EVA a is indeed ei, as @Rafal suggested. I believe this is evidenced by the glyphs when a has "swings" like n or r. In EVA, this case is represented by the letter u. The question of this "wave" can be solved by representing these glyphs as en and er.
schey chor chal cham cham cho
This line is exactly what I described as adding a null (which in this case is the initial ch) and splitting the word into its component numbers.
The repetition of cham cham is also elegant in its own way. If am is a number and it appears twice in the encrypted word, then it will appear twice in any ordering (if I arrange the letters in the word morning in alphabetical order, it will become GIMNNOR, with the N duplicated). It seems too, too suspicious to me...
Also, with the help of this page, I can reasonably assume that m = iin. In addition to the fact that it matches a and o, like iin, it appears closer to the end of the line, and it seems to be in cases where iin would not fit. For example, if cham cham were written as chaiin chaiin, cho would not fit.
This may be the trace of the original cipher before it was transformed into Currier A.
It is also worth noting that there is a high probability that EVA a is indeed ei, as @Rafal suggested. I believe this is evidenced by the glyphs when a has "swings" like n or r. In EVA, this case is represented by the letter u. The question of this "wave" can be solved by representing these glyphs as en and er.