26-06-2026, 10:48 PM
(This post was last modified: 26-06-2026, 10:58 PM by Mark Knowles.)
(26-06-2026, 09:50 PM)Aga Tentakulus wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.It’s not about the theory. It’s about how it’s presented.The following map is from 100 years later, but could give some guide as to what the lakes around Lucerne looked like at the time->
A so-called expert can’t tell you what it is, but he’ll tell you what isn’t possible.
Mark has experienced this with me. For example: If he considers the rosette to be lakes, even though some of them are reservoirs that weren’t built until 1930, I won’t accept that.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
But shorelines changed and there were floods, so reconstructing the lakes in the 1430 is difficult. More importantly those precise details make almost no difference to my theory. The key point is that there are many small lakes and bodies of water in the Lucerne region.

